We are interested in you and your health resolution.
Please take 30 secs to complete this poll. We appreciate your feedback!

When you, a family member or friend are first diagnosed with cancer it can hit the patient hard.

“Why me?”  They say. It can be a traumatic time.

Strong emotions may be associated with the diagnosis. There may be shock, denial,  confusion, guilt, anger, defeat, hopelessness and despair just to name a few.

The next thought is “what do I do now?” and “what is my strategy plan to defeat this?” Confusion can arise from the many directions facing the diagnosed and the information presented.

Diagnosed Cancer Patients Will Consider Their Options

Worse, friends and family who mean well, can begin voicing their own fears and issue their own from-the-hip recommendations. This can be confusing and cause unnecessary burden-bearing — as the already-beleaguered patient is already deciphering new information doing their best to split truth from collective self-interest.

Understand This: Cancer Is Big Business And A Major Growth Industry.

Current reports estimate the cancer industry to be worth tens of billions of dollars. The American Cancer Society (ACS) is accumulating incredible wealth in its role as a “charity.” According to James Bennett, professor of economics at George Mason University and a recognized authority on charitable organizations — in 1988 the ACS held a fund balance of over $400 million.

Of this $400 million, about $69 million was in holdings of land, buildings, and equipment. Of that money, the ACS spent only $90 million. That’s 26% of its budget— on medical research and programs. The rest was attributed to “operating expenses.” About 60% in generous salaries, pensions, executive benefits, and overheads. By 1989,  cash reserves of the ACS were up over $700 million.

In 1991, Americans, believing they were making a significant contribution to the fight for finding cancer cures gave almost $350 million to the ACS, 6% more than previous year. Over the last two decades an increasing proportion of the ACS budget comes from large corporations, including the pharmaceutical, cancer drug, telecommunications, and entertainment industries.

With this incredible amount of cash pouring in to the coffers, there may well be little motivation to actually find a cure!

After All, Find The Cure — And The Fund-raising Stops Pouring In, Doesn’t It?

Where does the cancer sufferer go, for bias-free help?

There would appear to be very little hope for the effective prevention or treatment of breast cancer from certain sectors. Why would a cure become a priority for the cancer industry when it is obvious following observation that the disease of cancer is a momentous ever-increasing industry with a spectrum of money-spinning services and  products?

Discovering The Real Motives Brings Freedom For The Cancer Patient

It is unfortunate and yet true: that understanding the real motives driving the traditional  health care system and the allied pharmaceutical industries is a real step forward in discovering what’s truly wrong with contemporary and systemised approaches to cancer treatment.

Many believe that the cure was actually found back in 1924 when Nobel Peace Prize winner Dr. Otto Heinrich Warburg found a co-relation between cancer and sugar.

“Summarized in a few words, the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar.” Says Dr Otto H. Warburg in Lecture. Warburg was utterly convinced of the accuracy of his conclusions and was frustrated by the lack of acceptance of his ideas. This frustration was evident as he cited Max Planck quoting “science doesn’t progress because scientists change their minds, but rather because scientists attached to erroneous views die, and are replaced.”

For more on Dr Otto H. Warburg, his incredible story and his findings, refer to the article on this website entitled “Nobel Peace Prize Winner Dr Otto Heinrich Warburg: The Cause Of Cancer.”

Cancer Prevention Or The Prevention Of Cancer Prevention
?  

Author Kevin Trudeau says: “Since the cancer industry is one of the most profitable industries in the world, anything that would adversely affect the profits of the cancer industry must be suppressed.”

Enormous profits creates high levels of self-interest which creates mind-blowing politics which creates copious minefields of misinformation for the suffering patient.

Much has already been written about the politics and profits of large companies issuing from the cancer disease.

But the truth is that the cancer patient now has an incredible opportunity to put this confusion far behind them and begin a wonderful journey learning about this amazing body that the Creator has made — and the inherent healing powers emanating from the immune system within.

Getting A Personal Strategy Plan Together Using Natural Means To Address Cancer

Natural approaches to treating cancer have been time-proven over and over again to work effectively over the long term, as they address the underlying cause of the illness.

A gardener who wishes to remove an unwanted plant will get nowhere constantly trimming the branches. At some point he or she address the plant from the roots to get rid of it forever. It is the same for the cancer-sufferer.

Whether the cancer patient have started to go down the path of conventional, traditional medicine or are considering their treatment options — being equipped with the correct information will empower the diagnosed to make well-informed decisions for your health resolution.

The answer is simplistic in it’s truth that taking personal responsibility for a real lifestyle change will produce better results.

More in “Cancer Treatments – The Power Of A Personal Strategy Part Two”

“There Is No Disease Whose Prime Cause Is Better Known…”

Warning: I wish to inform the website visitor and reader right here that the following article and testament you are about to read has been the cause of much discussion, controversy, self-interest, legal pursuits and politically juxta-positioning by many individuals, practitioners, researchers, doctors, surgeons, companies and corporations the world over.

But this story truly deserves to be read and comprehended. Because the findings of Warburg has split the opinion of so called “scientific opinion” and the pharmaceutical investments by many corporations in a trillion-dollar industry.

Got the picture?

It is from this historical account, that we can glean the well-known, oft-quoted statement by Dr Otto Warburg which begins: “But nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause [may] be.”

Two-time Nobel Peace Prize Winner Dr Otto Heinrich Warburg Links The Fermentation of Sugar As The Prime Cause Of Cancer

Dr Otto Heinrich Warburg In Berlin Labratory

Dr Otto Heinrich Warburg from a lecture delivered by Otto personally at the 1966 annual meeting of Nobelists at Lindau, Germany:

“…nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause [may] be. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse that one cannot do more about prevention.”

Nobel Peace Prize Winner Dr Otto Heinrich Warburg was born October 8, 1883 son of noted physicist Emil Warburg. He was an MD and a German physiologist.

Warburg was considered and had the honour of being known as one of the twentieth century’s leading biochemists.

That is no ‘mean feat.’

‘Otto’s father Emil Warburg, was a distant relative of the Warburg family of Altona who had converted to Christianity. Otto’s mother was the daughter of a Protestant family. Otto served as an officer in the elite calvary during WW1 earning the Iron Cross.

Notably, as WW1 was coming to an inevitable close Emil’s (Otto’s father’s) friend Albert Einstein wrote to Otto beseeching him to quit the army and return to academic studies citing that the world should not lose his great talents.

Albert Einstein, Friend to Dr Otto Warburg

In 1918 Otto became Professor at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Biology in Berlin-Dahlem. By 1931 he was named Director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cell Physiology. Otto examined the metabolism of tumors and the respiration of cells, particularly cancer cells, and in 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his “discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.”

Dr Otto Warburg Two Times Nobel Peace Prize Winner

Second Nobel Peace Prize Nomination.

By 1944, Otto was nominated again for the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. for his work on nocotinamide: the means and enzymes involved in fermentation, and the discovery of flavine. Otto was reportedly prevented from receiving the award thwarted by Adolf Hitler whom decreed in 1937 that Germans were forbidden from accepting Nobel Prizes. This is argued against by the Nobel Foundation.

In 1924, Warburg put forward that cancer and the growth of tumours are caused by the generating of energy by the non-oxidative breakdown of sugar/glucose — this is known as a process called glycolysis. This is in contrast to “healthy” cells which mainly generate energy from oxidative breakdown of pyruvate. Pyruvate is an end-product of glycolysis, and is oxidized within the mitochondria. Hence and according to Warburg, cancer should be interpreted as a mitochondrial dysfunction.

“Summarized in a few words, the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the respiration of oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar.” Dr. Otto H. Warburg in Lecture.

While Warburg continued to develop this outlook experimentally, holding several prominent lectures outlining the data, Otto proposed that some cancer cells switch over to a route which is oxygen-free called the glycolytic pathway. Interestingly, the cancer cells continue to use this conduit even when access to oxygen is restored. Though Warburg’s proposal has since been confirmed, the role played by glycolysis in cancer has been largely ignored.

The Nobel Peace Prize

The best modern summary of Warburg’s landmark work, may be found medically documented in the book, “The Hidden Story of Cancer,” by Brian Scott Peskin, BSEE-MIT. In the preface to the Second Revised German Edition of the Lindau Lecture: “The Way To The Prevention Of Cancer” Otto conjectures:

The Way To The prevention Of Cancer

“A list of selected active groups of respiratory enzymes will soon be published, to which we recently added cytohemin and d-amino-Levulinic acid, the precursor of oxygen-transferring hemins. In the meantime commercial vitamin preparations may be used that contain, besides other substances, many active groups of the respiratory enzymes. Most of these may be added to the food. Cytohemin and vitamin B12 may be given subcutaneously.” (A synonym of “active group” is “prosthetic” group of an enzyme.)

He adds later in another address on the “Preface to the First Edition” – the Prevention of Endogenous Cancer at Wiesenhof, August 1966:

“To prevent cancer it is therefore proposed first to keep the speed of the blood stream so high that the venous blood still contains sufficient oxygen; second, to keep high the concentration of hemoglobin in the blood; third to add always to the food, even of healthy people, the active groups of the respiratory enzymes; and to increase the doses of these groups, if a precancerous state has already developed.

If at the same time exogenous carcinogens are excluded rigorously, then most cancers may be prevented today.”

For more on developing a personal strategy for overcoming cancer, read the post entitled Cancer Treatments – The Power Of A Personal Strategy Part One

“These proposals are in no way utopian. On the contrary, they may be realized by everybody, everywhere, at any hour. Unlike the prevention of many other diseases the prevention of cancer requires no government help, and no extra money.”

The following is taken from a revised Lindau lecture: The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer by Otto Warburg, Director, Max Planck Institute for Cell Physiology, Berlin-Dahlem, Germany adapted from a lecture delivered by Otto himself at the 1966 annual meeting of Nobelists at Lindau, Germany.

“…for cancer, there is only one prime cause. Summarized in a few words, the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the respiration of oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar. All normal body cells meet their energy needs by respiration of oxygen, whereas cancer cells meet their energy needs in great part by fermentation.

All normal body cells are thus obligate aerobes, whereas all cancer cells are partial anaerobes. From the standpoint of the physics and chemistry of life this difference between normal and cancer cells is so great that one can scarcely picture a greater difference. Oxygen gas, the donor of energy in plants and animals is dethroned in the cancer cells and replaced by an energy yielding reaction of the lowest living forms, namely, a fermentation of glucose.

It is noted that Otto Warburg’s main interests were Chemistry and Physics of Life.

In both fields no scientist has been more successful.

For more information on Otto Warburg’s work, visit Healing Cancer Naturally (cancer cause and prevention)

Otto Warburg concludes his lecture with this:

“Why then does it happen that in spite of all this so little is done towards the prevention of cancer?

The answer has always been that one does not know what cancer or the prime cause of cancer [might] be, and that one cannot prevent something that is not known.”

“But nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause [may] be. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse that one cannot do more about prevention. That prevention of cancer will come there is no doubt, for man wishes to survive.”

Inhibiting The Application Of Scientific Knowledge?

Warburg goes on: “But how long prevention will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field. In the meantime, millions of men must die of cancer unnecessarily.”

UPDATE:  The December 2008 Journal of Lipid Research coauthored by Boston College Biology Professor Thomas Seyfried produces new interest among scientists in the work of German physician and biochemist Otto Warburg, who won the Nobel Prize in 1931.

Interestingly, Professor Seyfried says in effect that current explanations of the cause of cancer are deficient, which is why the discoveries of Dr Otto Warburg do not fade away into obscurity, today.

See Professor Thomas Seyfried on You Tube here:

In The Best Interests Of The Health & Wellness Seeker

The Western world as we know it — is on a collision course with chronic sickness and disease.

Although Australians enjoy one of the highest life expectancies in the world (WHO, 2004a), the latter part of the twentieth century has seen an epidemic emergence of modern chronic diseases and age/lifestyle-related health problems that greatly reduce quality of life.

These chronic diseases include prostate cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, diabetes type 1 and type 2,
hypertension (high blood pressure) and obesity to name a few.  

Since we operate utilising a natural body — shouldn’t the treatment of our body be natural also? And who is the natural custodian of our bodies — is it another person, a system, big business, a school of thought, TV ad campaigns, the government, the schools — or is it actually a much higher calling — a God-delegated personal responsibility?

If looking after our bodies is our responsibility — shouldn’t we enquire after a multitude of counsel and then set a course that includes natural, even organic treatments, tracking our progress with accountability partner?

Health Resolution Revolution seeks to review the above and in the best interests of the health and wellness seeker, especially for diagnosed sufferers who see the opportunity they have to reverse their status, this website seeks to positively explore more natural and organic means to assist the seeker to their effective prevention and/or health resolution.

Is Your Victory One Personal Strategy For Lifestyle Change Away?

It is our love of junk food, processed foods, sugar, alcohol, DVD’s, DS games, Wii’s, PC’s and TV which helps to feed a growing escalation in energy imbalances within our collective bodies that produces ill-health.

Our Own Personal Health Is A Stewardship Issue.

It cannot be blamed on MacDonalds, KFC or Burger King. It cannot be blamed on processed food manufacturers. It cannot be blamed on governments. The buck stops with us. It is a stewardship issue for which we must take a personal responsibility.

In Australia alone it is costing the nation $21 billion a year as we get fatter and acquire more chronic, life-threatening diseases such as prostate, ovarian and breast cancer, heart disease, obesity and diabetes just to name a few.

Worse, big business increasingly sees this as an opportunity to take advantage of individuals and families as the take-up swells into multinational  business, traditional medicine, health care and pharmaceutical companies by the millions. This epidemic will outrun the current infrastructure worsening any real care to the sick and vulnerable.

Cancer alone effects 1 in 3 families, today.

Are Our Institutions Dealing With Root Causes — Or Just Trimming Branches?

Where can the individual turn to — to get effective answers and real hope for their future?

We need the right information. We need to take back the stewardship of our own bodies to get well.

The content on this website addresses the ever-expanding issue of the treatment of chronic diseases in clear-cut perspective and simple language for the good and wellness of the individual.